State orders Day Labor Center closed in Laguna Beach

5 07 2006

Cross posted from Morning Coffee

LAGUNA BEACH – A longstanding day-labor center on Laguna Canyon Road has been ordered closed by Caltrans after an anti-illegal-immigration activist discovered the site was on state land without proper permits.

The Laguna Beach City Council responded that it will determine its strategy for dealing with the order at its next meeting, according to Caltrans spokeswoman Pam Gorniak. That meeting is July 11.

Gorniak said research had not yet been done to determine whether a permit could be issued to the center, allowing it to continue.

What entity can issue a permit to violate federal law? Is it possible to arrest the managers of the day-labor center on conspiracy charges? They are after all aiding and abetting criminal activity.

Minuteman member Eileen Garcia did the research determining that the site did not have necessary permits and presented the information to the California Department of Transportation on Wednesday.

Caltrans gave the city a notice on Thursday to remove the center “as soon as possible.” It remains unclear if the center will continue operating until the next council meeting.

Full Article here

**This was a production of The Coalition Against Illegal Immigration (CAII). If you would like to participate, please go to the above link to learn more. Afterwards, email the coalition and let Brian know at what level you would like to participate. 





Back to Work!

5 07 2006

Cross posted from Take Back Georgia

Fireworks

The 4th is over, the fireworks are gone, and I spent all morning sweeping the giant mess of burnt fuses and sawdust off my street. You know how Clark was about his Christmas lights on National Lampoon’s Christmas Vacation? That’s my family on the 4th of July - complete overkill, yet a whole lot of fun.. :)

I suppose you all heard that N. Korea celebrated with a fireworks display of their own…quite a message, wasn’t it? Nah - not really.

So - did y’all see this little gem?

Gang Accused of Conspiring to Kill Blacks

Federal prosecutors allege that members of the Avenues in L.A. plotted to commit violence against African Americans.

By John Spano, Times Staff Writer
July 4, 2006

Jose Cruz is a walking testament to what happens when a member turns against the Avenues street gang.

He has 30 scars from the stab wounds he suffered in one attempt on his life — on his arms, torso and legs. In another attack, he was beaten so severely that he has a visible dent in his skull, according to court papers, “the size and shape of a pistol butt.”

His street gang goes back five generations in Highland Park, which for Cruz is five miles and several lifetimes from the downtown courtroom where he is scheduled to testify as the star witness for the prosecution in the trial of a group of childhood friends.

Federal prosecutors, who launched their case last week, contend that the Avenues gang between 1994 and 2000 conspired to kill African Americans on their turf.

Men, women and children were harassed, terrorized, assaulted and slain as gang members sought to force black residents out of Latino neighborhoods, prosecutors said.

Authorities are using a federal hate-crime law based on the amendment to the U.S. Constitution that outlawed slavery, and another law created in the civil rights era, to go after four gang members. Barbara Bernstein, deputy chief of the criminal section of the civil rights divisions of the U.S. Department of Justice in Washington, is part of the prosecution team.

Attorneys for the defendants — Gilbert Saldana, Alejandro Martinez, Fernando Cazares and Porfirio Avila — have asserted that the federal government has no power to involve itself in a common street crime.

Defense attorney Reuven L. Cohen told jurors last week that one of the slayings cited in the charges — the 1999 shooting of Kenneth Wilson — was not a hate crime but “a simple gang killing committed out of boredom.”

Cohen said the crimes sprang from the “sad” truth of “a tension that exists between African American gangs and Latino gangs.”

The first of three former gang members, each in custody and hoping for leniency, testified Monday. Jesse Diaz, who described himself as a tagger from age 12, told jurors the Avenues decided to fight the “infestation” of blacks in Highland Park with a systematic terror campaign designed to run them out of the neighborhood.

Diaz, who has 10 more years to serve in prison for attempted murder, said the Avenues hated all rival gangs. But the antipathy for blacks was different, he said.

Highland Park became the scene of a game in which Diaz’s group of Avenues actually competed with another “clique” to run the most blacks out of Highland Park, he testified.

Two other informants, one serving a long state prison term and the other a deported immigrant, will tell jurors that Saldana shot Wilson repeatedly in 1999, explaining that Saldana had just acquired a gun and “wanted to test it out.”

One told the FBI in interviews that the gang got an order in 1998 from the Mexican Mafia prison gang to “kill any blacks … on sight.”

Rick Ortiz, a Los Angeles police spokesman, called the Avenues a “bully” gang that uses its large numbers to intimidate.

“The Avenues have been around for a long time,” Ortiz said. “They are the largest gang in the northeast area, with over 500 documented, active members.”

Although gang members have for years been subject to a court order that limits their activities, they remain active, authorities said. Their racial antipathy is an outgrowth of prison culture, in which rival street gang members band together by race and then bring those attitudes back to the streets, Ortiz said.

“When you have gang members standing out on the street corners, they intimidate people,” he said. “They may commit a minor offense, like vandalism, but people are so afraid of them they won’t call in. It diminishes the quality of life in the community.”

Heinrich Keifer, president of the Historic Highland Park Neighborhood Council, said racial violence by gang members is not currently a problem in the area.

“Our biggest problem is not so much gangs, although some members of the community are intimidated. It’s more the taggers,” Keifer said. “They create that feeling that the community is destroyed. The gangs aren’t ruling the turf. They’re not necessarily muscling people out. There was some of that in the past.

“The area is on the rebound, so much so that many Westsiders are moving in,” Keifer said, citing the historic heritage of the area northeast of downtown. “Many of the poorer people are struggling with the rising rents.”

As part of his strategy in the case, defense attorney Cohen plans to target the witnesses’ credibility.

Diaz and the two other former gang members are lying to curry favor with prosecutors, Cohen said. Defendants Saldana and Avila are in prison, serving life sentences without the possibility of parole for murder. Cazares is in custody on a parole violation. Martinez’s custody status could not be determined.

Prosecutors say the gang members conspired in various acts of violence, including:

• Wilson’s 1999 killing, which occurred when he returned to his Avenue 52 home late at night after a party, his nephew, Duane Williams, testified Thursday. Wilson was shot repeatedly by Saldana and two others because of his race, Assistant U.S. Atty. Alex Bustamante told jurors.

• Diaz testified that gang members beat a black homeless man with metal weapons, and attacked an African American man speaking on a pay telephone from behind and severely beat him.

Another black man was assaulted on the street because he was walking with a Latina, according to Bustamante.

• Finally, authorities say they have linked the killings of two other men to the Avenues, partly through ballistics. The victims were Christopher Bauser, who was shot execution-style at a bus stop in 2000, and Anthony Prudomme, also killed on a street.

Bustamante offered a chilling view of the mentality of the Avenues as the trial opened in U.S. District Judge Percy Anderson’s courtroom. Martinez was driving a van carrying five fellow Avenues members when he spotted Wilson.

“Anybody want to kill a nigger?” Bustamante said.

“Those are not my words, ladies and gentlemen,” Bustamante added, gesturing across the room to Martinez. “They are his.”

THIS is exactly what I have been talking about. The Hispanic gang mentality is passed down from one generation to another - many are taught to live this way.

Many of the youngsters aren’t parented, bored and packin’ heat.

That, my friends, is nothing but trouble - however, there is always a solution…

Close the borders.
Deport the illegals.
Punish gang activity to the fullest extent of the law.
Increase youth mentoring programs in school.
Remove gang grafitti a.s.a.p.
DO NOT TOLERATE GANG ACTIVITY IN YOUR CITY

**************************

Last, but not least, JC showed me a great website you should all check out (click here or the blog title link): Veterans for Secure Borders

*****As always…be safe and God bless!*****
**This was a production of The Coalition Against Illegal Immigration (CAII). If you would like to participate, please go to the above link to learn more. Afterwards, email the coalition and let me know at what level you would like to participate.**





Mexican Election Too Close To Call (so they didn’t!)

5 07 2006

Cross posted from Red Hot Cuppa Politics

So, the Presidential elections in Mexico are too close to call.

It may sound familiar, but it’s not.

First, the Mexican press is not allowed to call the election until the votes are counted. What a refreshing notion — since here in the US, our fearless media pundits called the election for Kerry at 1 pm CST.

Second, neither presidential candidate ceded defeat. They’re both claiming victory.

From Forbes, title link:

Two bitter rivals declared themselves winners of Mexico’s extraordinarily close presidential race despite election officials saying official results wouldn’t be ready for days - sparking cries of fraud from supporters and fears of violence.

The candidates - a conservative bureaucrat and a leftist - were separated by fewer than 300,000 votes with more than 30 million counted in a preliminary tally by electoral officials. Felipe Calderon had 37.1 percent to Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador’s 36.1 percent, according to results from 80 percent of polling places (notice the choice of adjectives used by the ever-so-objective MSM outlet — and Forbes is one of the best of the lot — FB)

AM Mora y Leon drove across the border, to provide some excellent coverage live from Tijuana:.

Seventy-one million Mexicans were qualified to vote, and based on what I saw in Tijuana, they took it seriously. Everyone voted. Many of those who forgot to register to vote from the consulates in the U.S. drove to Tijuana to vote - and there were polling stations right over on the other side of the border specifically for them.

Early in the morning, Mexican expat voters crossed the border into Mexico to vote for president as the sunrise broke across the east…

What was striking to me was that despite discontent with the PAN party under Fox, the support for PAN seemed to be rock solid and the people’s faith unshaken. Many cited their faith in free trade and desire to remain friends with the U.S. I found that moving.

There was one other factor that stood out for me - people said the number one issue was personal security, and they believed Felipe Calderon was the man who would be most likely to do something about it. I took a photo of a Calderon campaign poster. It was posted on a house that was literally a cage, it was so covered with security bars. Those two factors seemed to fit together.

As prosperity rises in Mexico’s north, Mexicans seemed to be more concerned about personal security than has generally been reported in the press. Jobs and education have been the dominant themes, but security was what people mentioned to me ..

Mark In Mexico has poll numbers, and links to an interesting article about how ex-pat Mexicans — that’s illegal immigrants to the US — have some problems crossing back into their homeland to vote.

The socialist candidate, Obrador, is reportedly supported by Hugo Chavez. If he wins, this will be a star in the crown of Chavez’ leftist ambitions for Latin America.

Prof.Budgie also watched the election coverage on Azteca TV last night. He was impressed by the fact that the Mexican press is not allowed to call the election before the votes are counted; the voting is strictly by headcount — there is nothing like an electoral college in Mexico. He also said that Fox’s party PAN (Partido Acción Nacional) seemed to be ahead in the governor’s races in the provinces.

Remember, since there are more than two serious political parties in Mexico, the winner’s percentage will probably be in the thirties. Because of splits, it will not be a majority — just a majority enough to win.

The good Prof made another interesting observation after hearing Vicente Fox’s speech carried by Azteca. Fox never closes with “God Bless Mexico” — as our own President does with “God Bless the USA …”

It is interesting; I seem to recall that other US Presidents have closed with “God Bless America” — and I suppose that if you’re the President of a country that doesn’t have the ACLU running around, trying to eradicate all traces of religion, you can choose to say it or not.

For more coverage on the Mexican election results, click to: : PoliBlog, Blue Crab Boulevard and Silent Running. Darrell has an interesting article on “Mexico’s Missing Prosperty … ” which provides some context to the election, I think.

For some excellent coverage on illegal immigration reform, click to the CoalitionBlog. Debbie over at RightTruth has an ascerbic post about some immigration “humor ,PoliticsFix 4 RSO, and Free Constitution are already posting this morning — and don’t miss MorningCoffee and Pursuing Holiness.

Debbie over at RightTruth has a couple of pithy comments about post illegal immigration, using a joke posted by Pursuing Holiness Of course, MorningCoffee has an excellent article with Did the Senate Just Blink? Senator Spector’s a hoot without even knowing it, right … ? Debbie’s got a more serious analogy of our borders being a bleeding wound, and she’s correct.

**This was a production of The Coalition Against Illegal Immigration (CAII). If you would like to participate, please go to the above link to learn more. Afterwards, email the coalition and let me know at what level you would like to participate.**





Mexico’s Missing Prosperity

5 07 2006

Cross posted from Morning Coffee

From the Washington Post

The subtext for the United States’ immigration debate is Mexico. Why doesn’t its economy grow faster, creating more jobs and higher living standards? That’s the question that inevitably confronts the winner of this Sunday’s Mexican presidential election, but it is also a critical question for Americans. A more prosperous country would not be sending so many of its poorest citizens north. Since 1990 about 20 to 25 percent of U.S. immigrants have come from Mexico.

It’s not that Mexico has made no progress. Its economy was once crisis-prone, inflation-ridden and heavily insulated from foreign trade. Now it has quelled inflation (about 4 percent, down from 17 percent in the late 1990s), controlled government spending and opened up to trade. Before adoption of the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1994, tariffs on covered imports averaged 12 percent (and were much higher in the 1980s); by 2001 they were 2 percent. The last financial crisis — a collapsing currency, an outflow of money — occurred in 1994 and 1995. In recent years its economy has grown almost 4 percent annually.

But that growth — fine for an advanced country such as the United States — doesn’t suffice for a poor country whose population is increasing (as is Mexico’s) by more than 1 percent a year. In China, economic growth averages 9 to 10 percent annually; in India, about 6 to 8 percent. Mexico isn’t in the same league.

Economies advance through the adoption of better technologies and business methods. Production and efficiency improve. Prices go down or incomes go up. Either way, people can buy more — more old stuff (say, food or housing); or more new stuff (say, Internet connections or iPods). In Mexico, this process is weak. To simplify slightly: Its economy consists of two vast sectors, each slow to adopt better technology and business practices.

One sector involves large, modern firms in semi-protected markets that limit the pressure to improve efficiency or lower prices. “Mexico’s business sector is risk-averse. It’s never had to operate in a true competitive environment,” says Pamela Starr, an analyst for the Eurasia Group, a consulting firm. “It’s operated with monopolies and oligopolies encouraged by the government.”

An extreme case in point is Pemex, the state-owned monopoly oil company. Without competitors or complaining shareholders, its operations are lax. In 2004 Pemex had $69 billion in sales and 137,722 employees, according to its Web site; in the same year, Exxon Mobil had $291 billion in revenue and 85,900 employees. Telmex, which dominates the phone market, is often cited as another example. In 2004 Mexico had the sixth-highest phone charges for an average customer of 29 OECD member countries.

Another example of failed socialistic policies

The other part of the economy is usually called the “informal sector.” It consists of thousands of small firms — street vendors, stores, repair shops, tiny manufacturers — that theoretically aren’t legal, because they haven’t registered with the government and often don’t pay taxes or comply with regulations on wages and hiring and firing. Almost two-thirds of Mexico’s workers may be employed in the informal sector, according to one rough estimate by the International Monetary Fund.

On paper, the leading candidates for president advocate different economic policies. Former Mexico City mayor Andr?s Manuel L?pez Obrador of the center-left Democratic Revolution Party urges more government activism.

More socialism… Exactly what they need….(note the sarcastic tone of my typing)

Felipe Calderon of the center-right National Action Party — the party of the incumbent, Vicente Fox — favors “the market.”

Yet with no plan to ease restrictions on capitol investment, especially foreign capitol. Regardless of who eventually takes the oath of office in Mexico, reform of its economy to one that can support its population will take time, and lots of it.

For Americans, the implications are sobering. Mexico has long regarded immigration as an economic safety valve. Whoever wins, that won’t change.

Which is why it is important for us as a nation to get a bill through congress that emphasizes border security and law enforcement. An overhaul of our immigration policies are needed as well, but take a back seat to securing our borders and enforcing the laws we have on the books.

**This was a production of The Coalition Against Illegal Immigration (CAII). If you would like to participate, please go to the above link to learn more. Afterwards, email the coalition and let me know at what level you would like to participate.**





Shoveling a Load

5 07 2006

Cross posted from Pursuing Holiness

Another one of those viral emails -

5,000 years ago Moses said, “Pick up your shovel, pack your ass, mount your camel and I shall lead you to the Promised Land.”

200-plus years ago, George Washington said, “Get off your ass, use your shovel, clear the land, grow plants for camels and it will be the promised land.”

Recently the Congress of the United States said “Si, Amigos, throw away your shovel, sit on your ass, light your Camels. We’re giving you the promised land.”

In Did the Senate Just Blink? Morning Coffee quoted Senator Specter:

“It may be down the line that we will come to some terms on a timetable, with border security first and employment verification first,” he said.

Why do people find these jokes amusing? Because there is a kernel of truth to it. We know the Senate bill was a massive giveaway to illegals and American businesses willing to break the law in order to have cheap labor and higher profits. This email is an example of the entrenched anger that many people feel about the Senate’s “comprehensive” reform, and that anger is not really going away. Now that illegal immigration is no longer the top news story, the anger is simmering, not boiling. Apply just a little heat and the pot will boil over again.

The House, who must fight to keep their jobs three times as often as the Senate, is quite a bit more tuned in to public sentiment on this issue. Immersed in all the legalese was the simple fact that illegal aliens who are permitted to stay under any conditions are, in fact, “cutting the line” in front of tens of thousands of applicants who have followed the rules and properly applied to enter the United States from their home countries. As a matter of simple fairness, this angers Americans. The “22 Problems With The Senate’s Illegal Immigration Bill” listed by John Hawkins at Right Wing News were just icing on that cake.

Emails like this one are signals of the anger many Americans feel about this, and our elected officials would do well to note them. Even people as anti-illegal immigration as I am will concede the difficulty of dealing with people who have been here for a long time. But if we stop the bleeding by closing the border, stitch the wound by forcing businesses to pay the price for their law breaking, and administer antibiotics by stopping government benefits to non-citizens, we will have effectively healed this problem. Consider the illegals who don’t self-deport under these conditions scar tissue, an unpleasant reality after an injury. After the injury is treated (all the other conditions are met) we can deal with it by allowing the illegals who remain a permanent resident status that entitles them to stay and work if they want to, but not receive any government handouts at all.

I hope that Morning Coffee was right and that the Senate blinked. Maybe they’re finally catching on to the reason these kinds of emails make the rounds. This problem is not going to go away.

**This was a production of The Coalition Against Illegal Immigration (CAII). If you would like to participate, please go to the above link to learn more. Afterwards, email the coalition and let me know at what level you would like to participate.





Slavery in Southern California

5 07 2006

Cross posted from The Amboy Times

Via Dhimmi Watch

You would think the Southern California press would be all over this story. Where’s Foxnews, Bill O’Reilly ? Don’t they love these crime stories? But this isn’t a cute blonde girl or an adorable middle class couple gone horribly wrong, it’s Islamic slavery right here on American soil. Best to ignore it.

Slavery is deeply ingrained in Islam, Mohammed himself was a slaveholder.

An Egyptian former couple have pleaded guilty to enslaving a 10-year-old girl in their southern California home. The girl, who was brought to the US from Egypt, was forced to work 16-hour days and was not allowed to leave the house during her 20-month ordeal.

Abdel Nasser Eid Youssef Ibrahim, 45, and his ex-wife, Amal Ahmed Ewis-abd Motelib, 43, agreed to plead guilty to four federal charges.

They face jail terms of three years when they are sentenced in October.
She was forced to clean their home, take care of their five children, prepare food and do the laundry, for no pay. She lived in squalor in the garage and was told that if she left the house in Irvine, southern California, she might be arrested.

The girl was discovered by immigration officials in April 2002 after an anonymous tip-off. The girl, whose name was not released, was brought to the US by the couple in August 2000 when she was 10.

The Orange County Register has some background…

In 1999, the girl’s older sister was working for Ibrahim and Motelib. The pair told the girl’s parents that they caught the sister stealing and threatened to report her unless her younger sister worked for them. So the parents decided to allow their younger daughter to work as a domestic servant. The parents agreed to pay 100 Egyptian pounds – about $30 – monthly to Ibrahim and Motelib for 10 years. Once here, the girl’s passport was taken. She didn’t receive any money and had to work as a nanny and housekeeper.

Apparently, this is somewhat common.
The girl is one of 53 human-trafficking victims in Orange County, according to Bob Jones, with St. Anselm’s Cross-Cultural Community Center, a member of the Orange County Human Trafficking Task Force. Most of the female victims who can apply for green cards choose to stay in this country. The girl has decided to stay. She is a ward of Orange County Superior Court and is living in foster care locally. She is taking summer school classes and aspires to attend college, Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert Keenan said. She has not been back to Egypt and doesn’t want to return, he added.

Loose Immigration laws enable this behavior, and political correctness demands a blind eye it’s inevitable results.

**This was a production of The Coalition Against Illegal Immigration (CAII). If you would like to participate, please go to the above link to learn more. Afterwards, email the coalition and let me know at what level you would like to participate.**