The Uncooperative Radio Show! Dec. 25, 26, and 27 2007

25 12 2007

MicrophoneWe have moved our shows Time!

Live, Independent, Conservative Talk Radio! Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursdays 9pm to 11pm Eastern Time.

I will be talking about important issues facing this country, Some things you will not find anywhere else, even on my blog. We also do regular segments on Gun Politics, Illegal Immigration and our military heroes. So, tune in, or wait for the podcast. The podcasts automatically appear in the left sidebar, I hope you enjoy that feature.

They are also paying us based on the amount of listeners, interactive listeners and downloads from their site. So if you have the time or inclination, listen live from my talkshoe page, listen to the podcasts from the left sidebar or download the podcasts from the shows homepage.

Monday through Thursday!

9pm Eastern
8pm Central
   7pm Mountain
6pm Pacific

Anyone can listen, but to call you must have an account. If you download the software you can also interact with the show and others logged in, with live chat.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Advertisements




Killing the Border Fence

23 12 2007

Cross posted from Virtuous Republic

H.R. 2764, known as the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008,
contains language, that in essence, means the border fence with Mexico
will not get built.Our elites aren’t interested in securing our borders
and every chance they get, they are going to undo the damage caused by
those pesky citizens who defeated amnesty and demanded enforcement of
our immigration laws. Michelle Malkin
has a good summary of what this bill does to the border fence.The
opponents of the border fence can claim they support it, but read the
language in the bill and tell me if you think a fence could be built
with all the attached requirements and conditions.

For expenses for customs and border protection fencing,
infrastructure, and technology, $1,225,000,000, to remain available
until expended: Provided, That of the amount provided under this
heading, $1,053,000,000 is designated as described in section 5 (in the
matter preceding division A of this consolidated Act): Provided
further, That provided under this heading, $650,000,000 shall not be
obligated until the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and the
House of Representatives receive and approve a plan for expenditure,
prepared by the Secretary of Homeland Security and submitted within 90
days after the date of enactment of this Act, for a program to
establish a security barrier along the borders of the United States of
fencing and vehicle barriers, where practicable, and other forms of
tactical infrastructure and technology, that includes:

(1) a detailed accounting of the program’s progress to date relative
to system capabilities or services, system performance levels, mission
benefits and outcomes, milestones, cost targets, program management
capabilities, identification of the maximum investment (including
lifecycle costs) required by the Secure Border Initiative network or
any successor contract, and description of the methodology used to
obtain these cost figures;

(2) a description of how activities will further the objectives of
the Secure Border Initiative, as defined in the Secure Border
Initiative multi-year strategic plan, and how the plan allocates
funding to the highest priority border security needs;

(3) an explicit plan of action defining how all funds are to be
obligated to meet future program commitments, with the planned
expenditure of funds linked to the milestone-based delivery of specific
capabilities, services, performance levels, mission benefits and
outcomes, and program management capabilities;

(4) an identification of staffing (including full-time equivalents, contractors, and detailees) requirements by activity;

(5) a description of how the plan addresses security needs at the
Northern Border and the ports of entry, including infrastructure,
technology, design and operations requirements;

(6) a report on costs incurred, the activities completed, and the
progress made by the program in terms of obtaining operational control
of the entire border of the United States;

(7) a listing of all open Government Accountability Office and
Office of Inspector General recommendations related to the program and
the status of Department of Homeland Security actions to address the
recommendations, including milestones to fully address them;

(8) a certification by the Chief Procurement Officer of the
Department that the program has been reviewed and approved in
accordance with the investment management process of the Department,
and that the process fulfills all capital planning and investment
control requirements and reviews established by the Office of
Management and Budget, including Circular A-11, part 7;

(9) a certification by the Chief Information Officer of the
Department that the system architecture of the program is sufficiently
aligned with the information systems enterprise architecture of the
Department to minimize future rework, including a description of all
aspects of the architectures that were and were not assessed in making
the alignment determination, the date of the alignment determination,
and any known areas of misalignment along with the associated risks and
corrective actions to address any such areas;

(10) a certification by the Chief Procurement Officer of the
Department that the plans for the program comply with the Federal
acquisition rules, requirements, guidelines, and practices, and a
description of the actions being taken to address areas of
non-compliance, the risks associated with them along with any plans for
addressing these risks, and the status of their implementation;

(11) a certification by the Chief Information Officer of the
Department that the program has a risk management process that
regularly and proactively identifies, evaluates, mitigates, and
monitors risks throughout the system life cycle and communicates
high-risk conditions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection and
Department of Homeland Security investment decisionmakers, as well as a
listing of all the program’s high risks and the status of efforts to
address them;

(12) a certification by the Chief Human Capital Officer of the
Department that the human capital needs of the program are being
strategically and proactively managed, and that current human capital
capabilities are sufficient to execute the plans discussed in the
report;

(13) an analysis by the Secretary for each segment, defined as no
more than 15 miles, of fencing or tactical infrastructure, of the
selected approach compared to other, alternative means of achieving
operational control; such analysis should include cost, level of
operational control, possible unintended effects on communities, and
other factors critical to the decision-making process;

(14) a certification by the Chief Procurement Officer of the
Department of Homeland Security that procedures to prevent conflicts of
interest between the prime integrator and major subcontractors are
established and that the Secure Border Initiative Program Office has
adequate staff and resources to effectively manage the Secure Border
Initiative program, Secure Border Initiative network contract, and any
related contracts, including the exercise of technical oversight, and a
certification by the Chief Information Officer of the Department of
Homeland Security that an independent verification and validation agent
is currently under contract for the projects funded under this heading;
and

(15) is reviewed by the Government Accountability Office:
Provided further, That the Secretary shall report to the Committees on
Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives on
program progress to date and specific objectives to be achieved through
the award of current and remaining task orders planned for the balance
of available appropriations: (1) at least 30 days prior to the award of
any task order requiring an obligation of funds in excess of
$100,000,000; and (2) prior to the award of a task order that would
cause cumulative obligations of funds to exceed 50 percent of the total
amount appropriated:Provided further, That of the funds provided under
this heading, not more than $2,000,000 shall be used to reimburse the
Defense Acquisition University for the costs of conducting a review of
the Secure Border Initiative network contract and determining how and
whether the Department is employing the best procurement practices:
Provided further, That none of the funds under this heading may be
obligated for any project or activity for which the Secretary has
exercised waiver authority pursuant to section 102(c) of the Illegal
Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C.
1103 note) until 15 days have elapsed from the date of the publication
of the decision in the Federal Register.

Of course our leaders didn’t kill the border fence in a obvious
manner, they have killed it by requiring the Secretary of Homeland
Security to meet impossible criteria.Then, a little later in the bill,
you find this, which among other things, requires the Secretary of
Homeland Defense to consult with homeowners, Indian tribes, and
environmentalists.

We’ve been lied to again.

SEC. 564. IMPROVEMENT OF BARRIERS AT BORDER. (a)
Section 102 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant
Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1103 note) is amended– (1) in
subsection (a), by striking `Attorney General, in consultation with the
Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization,’ and inserting
`Secretary of Homeland Security’; and (2) in subsection (b)– (A) in the
subsection heading, by striking `in the Border Area’ and inserting
`Along the Border’; (B) in paragraph (1)– (i) in the heading, by
striking `SECURITY FEATURES’ and inserting `ADDITIONAL FENCING ALONG
SOUTHWEST BORDER’; and (ii) by striking subparagraphs (A) through (C)
and inserting the following:

`(A) REINFORCED FENCING- In carrying out subsection (a), the
Secretary of Homeland Security shall construct reinforced fencing along
not less than 700 miles of the southwest border where fencing would be
most practical and effective and provide for the installation of
additional physical barriers, roads, lighting, cameras, and sensors to
gain operational control of the southwest border.

`(B) PRIORITY AREAS- In carrying out this section, the Secretary of
Homeland Security shall– `(i) identify the 370 miles, or other mileage
determined by the Secretary, whose authority to determine other mileage
shall expire on December 31, 2008, along the southwest border where
fencing would be most practical and effective in deterring smugglers
and aliens attempting to gain illegal entry into the United States; and
`(ii) not later than December 31, 2008, complete construction of
reinforced fencing along the miles identified under clause (i).

`(C) CONSULTATION- `(i) IN GENERAL- In carrying out this section,
the Secretary of Homeland Security shall consult with the Secretary of
the Interior, the Secretary of Agriculture, States, local governments,
Indian tribes, and property owners in the United States to minimize the
impact on the environment, culture, commerce, and quality of life for
the communities and residents located near the sites at which such
fencing is to be constructed. `(ii) SAVINGS PROVISION- Nothing in this
subparagraph may be construed to– `(I) create or negate any right of
action for a State, local government, or other person or entity
affected by this subsection; or `(II) affect the eminent domain laws of
the United States or of any State.

`(D) LIMITATION ON REQUIREMENTS- Notwithstanding subparagraph (A),
nothing in this paragraph shall require the Secretary of Homeland
Security to install fencing, physical barriers, roads, lighting,
cameras, and sensors in a particular location along an international
border of the United States, if the Secretary determines that the use
or placement of such resources is not the most appropriate means to
achieve and maintain operational control over the international border
at such location.’; and (C) in paragraph (4), by striking `to carry out
this subsection not to exceed $12,000,000′ and inserting `such sums as
may be necessary to carry out this subsection’. (b) No funds
appropriated in this Act for U.S. Customs and Border Protection `Border
Security Fencing, Infrastructure, and Technology’ may be obligated
unless the Secretary of Homeland Security has complied with section
102(b)(2)(C)(i) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant
Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1103 note) as amended by
subsection (a)(2).

**This was a production of The Coalition Against Illegal Immigration
(CAII). If you would like to participate, please go to the above link
to learn more. Afterwards, email brianbonner90-at-gmail-dot-com and let
us know at what level you would like to participate.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,





Indoctrination via high school Spanish class in Ohio

19 12 2007

Cross posted from Conservative Common Man

“Students struggle as immigrants do” is the headline from The Columbus Dispatch.

Seniors in Erica Vierya’s Spanish class at Olentangy Liberty High
School engage in a three week projectbefitting of Hitlery Clinton’s
proposed Public Service Academy. The students must assume immigrant
identities, fill out the legal paperwork, and then once the teacher
denies them legal status they must come up with a plan to enter and
survive illegally.

Ms. Vierya doesn’t intend “to sway the students, only to teach them
a little empathy.” In this class illegal immigrants are viewed in the
same light as a child adopted from a Russian orphanage, at least in one
child’s opinion. That child (the one adopted from a Russian orphanage)
was apparently not taught the differences between a legal adoption and illegally
entering a country, burdening the taxpayers, and assisting selfish
business owners in driving down the wages of American workers.

The fact that the the plague that is the illegal invasion of our
nation is being likened to to the wonderful act of adopting a baby from
a foreign orphanage is indicative of just how far education has veered
left. The legal adoption of a baby is a loving act by individuals.
Empathizing with the attack on our sovereignty isn’t exactly the same
thing.

Perhaps next year the rest of the school should get involved with the project:

  • Math classes can assign students the task of budgeting money paid
    “under the table” and figuring out the difference between what they
    would pay in medical bills and co-pays vs. what they save by not having
    insurance and being treated at taxpayer expense.
  • English classes can be picketted during the three week project since it is racist to expect people to learn English.
  • Government classes can have students role play as disenfranchised
    voters who were expected to be citizens and registered to vote before
    actually being allowed to vote. This might require a presentation by a
    representative of the ACLU or La Raza.
  • While they are at it, perhaps the Freshman Physical Education class
    can take a field trip across state lines to a taxpayer funded abortion
    mill and be shown the preferred method of taking victims of statutory
    rape in for abortions without notifying parents or authorities.

**This was a production of The Coalition Against Illegal Immigration
(CAII). If you would like to participate, please go to the above link
to learn more. Afterwards, email brianbonner90- at-gmail- dot-com and
let us know at what level you would like to participate.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,





What if border residents don’t WANT a fence?

18 12 2007

ADDED by The Uncooperative Blogger: I could care less how it affects anyone on the border, your country comes first; never forget that.

Cross posted from Right Truth:

Many who are opposed to illegal aliens crossing the Southern border have pushed for a fence. But what about the landowners along the border? How does this affect their property, their means to making a living, access to water for crops of livestock? Do these people have any say in what happens on their property?

“In a written ultimatum to South Texas landowners opposed to plans to build a border fence, federal officials foreshadow the possible use of eminent domain to buy land for border fence construction.

Department of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff sent the letter to property owners who either refused or ignored requests to let federal land surveyors on their property.

The letter says the government will first try to negotiate with landowners for the purchase of property it needs for construction of the fence. But it also warns that if no deal is reached, the government may go to court to “seek title and possession, and the court will determine fair market value.” (ChronWatch)

Some protesters say the fence will destroy their property, others are worried about nature, natural habitats, etc. The legitimate concerns of landowners must betaken into consideration.

Petition Congress to Reinstate $3 Billion in Border Fence Funds, from Numbers USA:

Read it and sign it at: www.ReformUS.org

Without explanation, Congress has stripped away $3 billion in desperately needed funds to build the Border Fence that it approved last year and to provide for other border security.

That’s right—without telling the public, Congress is pulling the plug on the U.S.-Mexico Border Fence that it voted for with such enthusiasm last year (just before they asked voters to re-elect them).

Help us turn this petition into a national overnight phenomenon. Time is critical—Congress will finalize this funding question before Christmas!

Will you take a minute to sign it right now? Go to www.ReformUS.org.

IF CONGRESS DOES NOT RESTORE THE FUNDING . . .

. . . THERE WILL BE NO BORDER FENCE!

ROY BECK
President, NumbersUSA

1601 N. Kent Street, St. 1100
Arlington, VA 22209

Others on illegal aliens, a/k/a criminal invaders:

Tennessee Couple Faces $7,854 Tax Bill Due To Illegal Alien Identity Theft, Digger’s Realm, who also has “Clinton’s Top Five Priorities – Funny How Immigration Is Missing But Health Care Isn’t

Dealing With Illegal Aliens Through Attrition

Illegal Aliens and Election Fraud, Faultline USA

**This was a production of The Coalition Against Illegal Immigration (CAII). If you would like to participate, please go to the above link to learn more. Afterwards, email brianbonner90-at-gmail-dot-com and let us know at what level you would like to participate

Technorati Tags: , , , ,





Border Patrol Agents Fire Tear Gas Over Border at Mexican Attackers

18 12 2007

Border Patrol agents are firing tear gas and powerful pepper-spray weapons across the border into Mexico to repel what the agency says are an increasing number of attacks by assailants hurling rocks, bottles and bricks.

Good! It is about time they did something to defend themselves.

The counteroffensive has drawn complaints that innocent families are being caught in the crossfire.

“A neighbor shouted, ‘Stop it! There are children living here,” said Esther Arias Medina, 41, who on Wednesday fled her Tijuana, Mexico, shanty with her 3-week-old grandson after the infant began coughing from smoke that seeped through the walls.

A helmeted agent on the U.S. side said nothing as he stood with a rifle on top of a 10-foot border fence next to the three-room home that Arias shares with six others.

“We don’t deserve this,” Arias said. “The people who live here don’t throw rocks. Those are people who come from the outside, but we’re paying the price.”

That is right! That is how it works, if your government, fellow citizens and police cannot control these people, we will. Unfortunately for you, you will suffer for their actions.

The Border Patrol says its agents have been attacked nearly 1,000 times during a one-year period.

The agency’s top official in San Diego, Mike Fisher, said agents are taking action because Mexican authorities have been slow to respond. When an attack happens, he said, American authorities often wait hours for them to come, and help usually never arrives.

“We have been taking steps to ensure that our agents are safe,” Fisher said.

Mexico’s acting consul general in San Diego, Ricardo Pineda, has insisted that U.S. authorities stop firing onto Mexican soil. He met with Border Patrol officials last month after the agency fired tear gas into Mexico. The agency defended that counterattack, saying agents were being hit with a hail of ball bearings from slingshots in Mexico.

Tough! Your citizen’s are attacking our Border Patrol on U.S. soil! We will defend ourselves!

Agent Joseph Ralph estimates he has been struck by rocks 20 times since joining the Border Patrol in 1987, once fracturing a shoulder blade. “You find yourself trying to take cover,” he said.

About four months ago, a large rock struck the hood of agent Ellery Taylor’s vehicle. “The only thing you can think is, ‘I’m glad that that wasn’t my head.’ There’s no way to see it coming,” Taylor said.

In October, agents in California and Arizona received compressed-air guns that shoot pepper-spray canisters more than 200 feet. Agents already had less powerful pepper-launchers that lose their punch after about 30 feet — even less if absorbed by thick clothing or cardboard.

The Border Patrol says the pepper weapons are a less lethal alternative to regular guns, but they have caused at least one fatality. In October 2004, a college student died after she was struck in the eye by a pepper-spray canister that officers fired to control a celebration of the Red Sox’s pennant win.

Border Patrol SWAT teams along the 1,952-mile U.S.-Mexico border are also equipped with tear gas, “flash bombs” that emit blinding light and “sting ball” grenades that disperse hundreds of tiny rubber pellets.

U.S. officials say the new tactics may spare lives. An agent shot and killed a 20-year-old Mexican man whose arm was cocked back in March in Calexico, Calif., where rock attacks have soared in the last year. Two years ago, an agent fatally shot a rock thrower at the San Diego-Tijuana border.

No criminal charges were filed in either case.

**This was a production of The Coalition Against Illegal Immigration (CAII). If you would like to participate, please go to the above link to learn more. Afterwards, email brianbonner90-at-gmail-dot-com and let us know at what level you would like to participate.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,





The Uncooperative Radio Show! Dec. 11, 12, 13 and 15 2007

11 12 2007

MicrophoneLive, Independent, Conservative Talk Radio! Monday through thursday and Saturday, this week, 8pm to 10pm Eastern Time.

Special Guests:
Saturday: Daniel Essek for U.S. Senate


I will be talking about important issues facing this country, Some things you will not find anywhere else, even on my blog. We also do regular segments on Gun Politics, Illegal Immigration and our military heroes. So, tune in, or wait for the podcast. The podcasts automatically appear in the left sidebar, I hope you enjoy that feature.

They are also paying us based on the amount of listeners, interactive listeners and downloads from their site. So if you have the time or inclination, listen live from my talkshoe page, listen to the podcasts from the left sidebar or download the podcasts from the shows homepage.

Monday through Thursday!

8pm Eastern
7pm Central
6pm Mountain
5pm Pacific

Anyone can listen, but to call you must have an account. If you download the software you can also interact with the show and others logged in, with live chat.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,





Ilegal Aliens and Election Fraud

11 12 2007

Cross posted from Faultline USA

As the left proclaims that there will be a massive Latino voter turnout
in 2008, more and more cities across the nation are claiming that they
can’t stop voter fraud among illegal aliens. The following is a summary
and full text of yesterday’s press release from American Unity Legal Defense Fund.

Summary:
American
Unity Legal Defense Fund files Amicus Curiae brief in Crawford vs.
Marion County Elections Board case pending before the Supreme Court.
They ask the Court to consider the danger of illegal aliens voting:
Cases and reports over many years indicate that non citizens have voted
illegally across the country. The American Unity Legal Defense Fund
(AULDF) filed an Amicus Curiae brief today in the Crawford vs. Marion
County Elections Board case now pending before the U.S. Supreme Court.
The case centers on the State of Indianas attempts to protect its
election day operations by requiring voters to show photo
identification at the polls.
Summary source

Full Text follows:

Illegal Alien Issue Added to Supreme Court Voter ID Case

FOR RELEASE: Monday, December 10, 2007

CONTACT: Edith Hakola, Esq.

American Unity Legal Defense Fund (540) 347-4766

Download full brief in pdf format CLICK HERE

Illegal Alien Issue Added to Supreme Court Voter ID Case

Non-profit
Group’s Amicus Brief Asks Court to Consider Election Fraud by
Non-Citizens in Crawford vs. Marion County Elections Board.

(Warrenton,
VA)..The American Unity Legal Defense Fund (AULDF) filed an Amicus
Curiae brief today in the Crawford vs. Marion County Elections Board
case now pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. The case centers on the
State of Indiana’s attempts to protect its election day operations by
requiring voters to show photo identification at the polls.

AULDF’s
brief, in support of Indiana’s voter identification law, supports the
state’s position by specifically asking the Court to consider the
danger of non-citizens casting ballots. The Amicus brief states: “Cases
and reports over many years indicate that non-citizens have voted
illegally across the country.”

Opponents to the Indiana law who
have filed Amici briefs include the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, the ACLU,
the Indiana Democratic Party, and the Mexican American Legal Defense
and Education Fund (MALDEF). They claim: “… mandating that those
seeking to vote in-person produce a government issued photo
identification violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the
United States Constitution.” Further, they argue that “in-person voter
impersonation fraud” – which they contend is the only problem addressed
by the statute in question – “does not exist.”

Yet AULDF
uncovered several instances of clear, documented “in-person voter
impersonation fraud” in the first city it examined. Numerous other
voter frauds were also detected which could have resulted in voter
impersonation frauds.Some included forgery. But others included changes
in existing registration data, a pattern which has been repeated across
the country. These trends, contend AULDF, could have easily led to
voter impersonation fraud.

AULDF asserts that opponents to the
Indiana law have failed to recognize the value of voter identification
procedures in stopping actual and potential voter impersonations.

AULDF
points out that illegal aliens increasingly perpetrate registration
fraud. “[T]he lack of immigration law enforcement is significant,” and
that the threat of non-citizens impacting the election process is
growing. For “illegal immigrants, voting records have a substantial
value as evidence of employment eligibility.”

More importantly,
asserts AULDF, recent political efforts have given illegal immigrants a
non-economic incentive to participate in election-related activities:
to increase political “clout” in hopes of achieving immigration law
changes.

Edith Hakola, Executive Vice President of the American
Unity Legal Defense Fund commented, “We entered this case because the
integrity of the electoral process is crucial to participatory
democracy. Voter fraud breeds distrust of our government.” Mrs. Hakola,
a Virginia attorney who was appointed by President Reagan to the
ten-member council of the Administrative Conference of the United
States, also said “Voters who fear their legitimate votes will be
outweighed by non-citizens who fraudulently cast ballots will be
discouraged from exercising their right to vote. We want the Supreme
Court to consider this threat to our democracy in their deliberations.”

The
American Unity Legal Defense Fund is an independent, national,
non-profit educational organization dedicated to preserving our
historical unity as Americans into the 21st Century.
http://www.americanunity.org/index.htm

About American Unity Legal Defense Fund (from their web page)
“The
American Unity Legal Defense Fund is an independent, national,
non-profit educational organization that advances the cause of
immigration reform in the legal arena. We’re bringing to the courts’
attention information that could shape the critical decisions that
judges make – and we’re combating a formidable array of left-wing legal
organizations that are increasing their focus on immigration. . . .)

American Unity Legal Defense Fund, P.O Box 420, Warrenton, VA 20187

Technorati Tags: , , , ,








%d bloggers like this: